
“I can’t bear Jane Austen’s tedious books,” thundered one recent pundit in a UK national daily newspaper (I won’t mention which one, I’ll leave it up to you to guess).¹ “Jane Austen’s so boring, even her culture war is dreary,” declared another recent hack who used to pontificate on fast motorcars for a living. And, in ancient history – 2013, to be more precise – another writer for Grub Street who should know better wrote, “So dull. So over-rated. Jane Austen doesn’t deserve to be on the £10 note.”
It won’t surprise you to note that the first two of these are males of a broadly rightwing – or at least firmly reactionary – persuasion, writing for papers owned by an over-powerful Australian magnate; the last is a literary critic (a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, no less, with a doctorate on Henry James and Freud) who commented in the pages of a rag owned by a secretive family firm based on an offshore tax haven. The first two have determinedly promoted an “anti-woke” agenda even before the term was invented while the last cattily described Austen as “a bitchy marriage-broker who never married.” Ouch, that’s Jane dismissed, the pretentious hussy.
Of course we’re all entitled to our opinions, are we not, whether we’re a highly qualified lecturer and author, a noted misogynist, a convert to farming to avoid inheritance tax or, in my case, a nonentity who blogs ignorantly about literary matters. My point is that the three professional writers are prominent contrarians – courting controversy on very public platforms with deliberately provocative statements; should we take their headlining assessments as anything more than mental barbs designed to raise our hackles?
Continue reading ““Mimsy, Tedious and Woke”? #ReadingAusten2025″
























